Werner Herzog has always been the mythic figure of world cinema—a director who wrestled steamships over mountains, filmed in war zones, and coaxed performances out of actors that bordered on the supernatural. But this year, at age 82, Herzog sat down with CBS’s 60 Minutes and quietly rewrote film history with a confession that left the room in stunned silence: “I actually helped him write it.” He was talking about Klaus Kinski’s notorious autobiography, the one that called Herzog “a hateful, malevolent creep.” But as Herzog revealed, that was just the beginning of a story so wild, so volatile, that it makes even the most legendary Hollywood feuds look tame by comparison.

To understand why Herzog would help Kinski trash his own reputation, you have to go back to a cramped Munich boarding house in 1955. Herzog was just 13, navigating postwar Germany with his mother and brother. Into their lives blew Klaus Kinski—a homeless actor whose arrival detonated the household. Kinski’s outbursts became legendary, with marathon screaming sessions that shattered windows and terrified neighbors. At one point, he locked himself in a bathroom for two days, tearing it apart with his bare hands. For most, this would have been a nightmare. For Herzog, it was a revelation. He watched, fascinated, as Kinski blurred the line between genius and madness.

That early exposure to raw human chaos became Herzog’s blueprint—not just for directing, but for surviving and channeling the unpredictable. Years later, when producers were too afraid to work with Kinski, Herzog didn’t hesitate. He knew how to handle the man who had once lived naked in a room filled with leaves, convinced he was achieving artistic purity. Herzog saw in Kinski a force of nature—dangerous, magnetic, and completely uncontrollable.

Their partnership reached its fever pitch with Aguirre, the Wrath of God, filmed in the jungles of South America. Herzog called Kinski in the middle of the night, offering him the lead. The response was pure Kinski: a torrent of insults and rage through the phone. But Herzog knew that in Kinski-speak, anger meant yes. He mailed the script, and their collaboration began.

The shoot itself was legendary for its chaos. Cast and crew lived on rafts, battling insects, exhaustion, and the elements. Kinski’s tantrums were daily events—he once hurled a helmet off-camera, nearly hitting a crew member. Herzog refused to back down. When Kinski threatened to leave, Herzog famously told him he’d shoot him and then himself if he tried. The madness was real, and it was orchestrated. Herzog kept the camera rolling, capturing performances that felt less like acting and more like psychological warfare.

And then there were the monkeys. When Kinski became convinced the jungle animals were conspiring against him, Herzog responded by releasing dozens of monkeys onto the set. The resulting scene, with Kinski spinning alone on a raft surrounded by chaos, became the film’s haunting final image—a moment of unscripted madness that critics would later call genius.

But the partnership’s darkness didn’t end there. On Fitzcarraldo, Herzog dragged a real 340-ton steamship over a mountain in Peru, refusing to use models or special effects. The production was plagued by disaster—lost financing, illness, injuries, and a plane crash. Kinski’s rages alienated the indigenous extras, and at one point, a tribal chief offered to kill Kinski for Herzog. He declined, not out of loyalty, but necessity. The show had to go on.

Herzog’s journals from the time, later published as Conquest of the Useless, describe the jungle as a living, hostile force. Crew members lost limbs, and the production marinated in danger. Herzog believed that the struggle was the film, that conquering nature and chaos would reveal a deeper truth.

But that pursuit of truth came at a cost. Herzog manipulated everyone—crew, natives, even Kinski—to get the performances he wanted. He encouraged real anger and emotion, blurring the line between art and reality. The films became living documents of obsession, pain, and sometimes, questionable ethics.

The darkness behind the camera was even deeper. Years after Fitzcarraldo, Kinski’s daughter Pola published Kindermund, a memoir detailing years of sexual abuse at her father’s hands. Herzog was shocked, admitting that if he’d known, he would have cut all ties. The myth of the mad genius crumbled, replaced by the reality of a man whose violence extended far beyond the set.

Herzog’s own complicity came under scrutiny. Had he enabled Kinski’s abuse by keeping him close, by channeling his rage into art? Critics began to revisit the films, questioning what role Herzog played in shielding Kinski from accountability. Herzog, always candid, said in interviews that he believed Pola without reservation. He had no knowledge, but the revelation forced him to rethink everything—the films, the partnership, even his own legacy.

And then, on 60 Minutes, Herzog dropped his final bombshell. He had helped Kinski write the autobiography that trashed him, even bringing a dictionary and thesaurus to make the insults more creative. For Herzog, it was a performance—a way to manage Kinski’s mania, to turn chaos into art. He described their relationship as mutual destruction disguised as cinema, a codependency that blurred the line between brilliance and abuse.

Herzog’s recent memoir, Every Man for Himself and God Against All, lays bare the truth: the chaos wasn’t accidental, it was curated. Kinski was unbearable, but that was the point. Herzog openly admits they discussed how they’d kill each other, not as metaphor, but as practical reality. Their films—Aguirre, Fitzcarraldo, Woyzeck, Nosferatu, Cobra Verde—aren’t just cinematic triumphs. They’re evidence of a relationship that thrived on the edge of destruction.

Today, Herzog condemns Kinski’s abuse but still defends the art. It’s a moral puzzle: can something beautiful come from something broken? Herzog’s revelations have shattered the myth of the untouchable mad genius, exposing the quiet complicity that kept the madness going. In the end, the question isn’t just what Kinski did, but what Herzog allowed—and what audiences continue to celebrate.

At 82, Herzog exposes Kinski not with rage, but with clarity and sorrow. The real question isn’t why Kinski exploded, but why Herzog stayed. And when genius demands that kind of loyalty, what does it cost everyone else?