Colbert’s Comedy Comes at a Price

CBS is feeling the sting of its late-night strategy, reportedly bleeding up to $50 million each year thanks to Stephen Colbert’s current brand of comedy. With “The Late Show” doubling down on progressive themes and sharp political jabs, the network is discovering that not all laughs are created equal.

While Colbert still commands a fiercely devoted following, insiders say his unapologetically partisan routines are turning off a broader swath of viewers—and with them, crucial ad dollars. Executives at CBS are now wrestling with the fallout, questioning whether late-night TV can afford to be a political soapbox when mainstream appeal is slipping away. The mounting losses are a stark reminder: when comedy becomes combat, the bottom line can take a direct hit.

Sydney Sweeney: The Denim Dynamo

Meanwhile, Hollywood’s rising sensation Sydney Sweeney is proving that star power can be a marketer’s dream. In a single, buzz-worthy appearance for American Eagle—simply by donning denim—the actress sent the retailer’s stock price surging by 10%. That translates to a staggering $200 million boost in market value, all from one viral moment.

Sweeney’s fashion statement lit up social media, driving home a powerful message for brands: in today’s influencer economy, authenticity and cultural cachet can move markets overnight.

Influence Pays, Polarization Costs

The contrast between these two stories couldn’t be sharper. On one side, CBS is grappling with the financial backlash of late-night content that divides rather than unites. On the other, a single celebrity’s genuine connection with fans is delivering instant, measurable returns for a major brand.

It’s a tale of two strategies in the modern media landscape:

Networks risk millions when programming alienates segments of their audience.

Stars with real influence can spark economic windfalls with a single appearance.

As CBS faces tough questions about the future of late-night, the lesson is clear: in an era where culture and commerce are more intertwined than ever, the right kind of influence is worth its weight in gold—while the wrong kind can cost a fortune.